Sean Maguire Teases Timeless Turn as James Bond's Ian Fleming, 'Very Interesting' Once Upon a Time Encore

NBC’s Timeless heroes will be shaken, if not stirred, when they bump into James Bond’s creator, Ian Fleming, this Monday at 10/9c.

Once again nipping at Flynn’s heels, Lucy, Rufus and Wyatt travel to the 1940s to keep an atomic weapon from falling into the wrong hands, and too soon into World War II. There, they meet James Bond’s creator, during his time as a cunning MI-6 agent.

Sean Maguire spoke with TVLine about channeling “the godfather of spy novels” (crash course on German, included!), as well as his upcoming (and improbable) return as Once Upon a Time‘s dearly departed Robin Hood.

TVLINE | Under what circumstances do we meet Mr. Ian Fleming?
We meet him doing his “day job,” before he became famous. I suppose I knew it, and some of my friends knew it, because we’re British and Bond fans, but a lot of people didn’t know that Ian Fleming was actually a genuine MI-6 spy during the war, before he wrote the famous novels. We get to see where the inspiration for Bond presumably came from, which for an actor is like a day at a candy factory.

TVLINE | How do Lucy, Wyatt and Rufus each take to him?
I can’t praise Jim Barnes, the writer, enough. It’s one of the best one-hours I’ve had the pleasure to be involved with, partly because it’s such fun subject mater, but also because of the characters. Whether it be Rufus, who’s obviously dealing with the “double agent” aspect of his own character, or Wyatt, who’s like, “F–k it, we’ve got to do what’s right, to hell with the rule book,” which he and Fleming see eye to eye on. And then there’s Lucy — Fleming not only fancies her and wants to flirt with her, but he also sees that she’s a capable agent. He presumes she’s a fellow agent, not just a historian. All three of the main characters get to have an interesting little side part with Fleming.

TVLINE | The synopsis says the four of you attend an “uncomfortable party.” What’s uncomfortable about t?
Well, it’s a party full of Nazis. [Laughs] That’s a good way to start making things uncomfortable! But there’s a gathering of the SS hierarchy to preside over the launching of missiles at innocent targets, so the gang and Fleming’s mission is to prevent this mass destruction weapon from being fired into Belgium, killing millions. It’s high stakes, a lot like a Bond film!

TVLINE | How’s your German?
I did not speak a word of German before I did this, and when I read the audition sides, it had just one thing in German. I have a good Austrian friend who came over and worked with me for a few hours. Then when they gave me the role, there were about six or seven scenes in German, and I was like, “Oh! This is an issue, because I don’t speak German,” but I got a fantastic coach and we just worked and worked and worked on trying to get it to sound as real as possible. I’m sure there will be some German fans saying I didn’t say something quite right, but you have to bear with me — it was like trying to learn the guitar in two days. Getting to perform in another language really made the experience more heightened for me, and thus more enjoyable.

TVLINE | What if anything were your surprised to learn about Ian Fleming, as you did this?
Things about his personal life, away from being the spy and the famous novelist. He had a slightly questionable approach to his love life, let’s say. He’s a very odd, complex, not-easy-to-sum-up-in-a-media friendly-sound bite kind of character.

TVLINE | ONCE UPON A TIMEYou’re clean-shaven in this. Did you have enough time to grow back your scruff for your return to Once Upon a Time?
I’m working on it as we speak! I’m going back up pretty soon, so I’m starting to feel slightly more bearded again.

TVLINE | What can you say about the how and the why of Robin Hood’s return?
I can say why from my point of  view: For one, I was very nicely asked. And two, as we discussed the last time you and I spoke, I feel that a lot of people weren’t loving how that abrupt end came about. I said to you that I was disappointed, too, that the fans did not get an end to the character that they wanted or maybe deserved, so hopefully the idea is to come back and maybe give a bit more closure to this character. I actually don’t know all the details, just the premise of what the [series creators] pitched to me, and I thought it sounded very interesting. Fingers crossed they’ll do their usual bang-up, good job and the audience can maybe see a last interesting adventure for Robin Hood.

TVLINE | Did the fact that it’s for multiple episodes sell you on returning? If it was just a one-off, might you have politely declined?
No, the prerequisite was “What story do you want to tell?” I sort of said, “I’ll go first: If it’s this or that, that might not be the ideal thing for me. But if the story is something that we all feel is an exciting chapter to tell, that’s the deal-breaker. That’s really what it was all about, whether it was one episode or 10. I obviously had no intention of going back, because I, like they, felt that that was it and it was done. But the story that they pitched sounded interesting, and they seemed excited about it. Hopefully, the audience will enjoy it.

TVLINE | And safe to say you’ll be working with Lana Parrilla again — maybe twice as much, now that there are two of her.
Yeah! That’d be great to work with both of her. Because I like both of her. If I get to be in a scene with both of her, that’d be double the fun!

Comments are monitored, so don’t go off topic, don’t frakkin’ curse and don’t bore us with how much your coworker’s sister-in-law makes per hour. Talk smart about TV!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

8 Comments
  1. Starbuck84 says:

    This Monday’s episode of Timeless sounds like it might be their best one yet. An interesting era to travel to and what a cool bit of history to play with that the man who created James Bond was a spy in WWII.
    Also happy they’re giving his OuaT character better closure. It’s just so ridiculous to think that they have their characters spend a whole half-season to bring that Captain Hook back from death, but when someone else who dies it’s 1 scene with a magic mcguffin never mentioned before and a quick funeral and you’re done forever.

  2. Kevin K says:

    This should be the best if not one of the best episodes of Timeless in its first season.

  3. N says:

    Love this show

  4. Carla Krae says:

    Ian Fleming based James Bond on Christopher Lee, a fellow agent. Lee wasn’t just an actor.

  5. Jake says:

    I’m really on the fence about this show. It’s shot in Canada, and really shows it’s Canadian sensibilities, in that nobody ever gets shot during a shootout, and they talk incessantly about why they shouldn’t shoot anyone (much like the Canadian SWAT show Flashpoint). Compare this to NBC’s other show Blindspot, where they stack ’em up like cord wood.
    Not that this show needs to show killings, just don’t make it so contrived that they just miss killing the bad guy every episode – it’s getting old, and we’re only four episodes in. It seems that a more competent capture team would have gotten the bad guys by now. Too much “just missed” or some contrived thing happens to make them not succeed. I would mind it less if they were actually thwarting the bad guy each week and he was just coming up with new ideas. It seems like they’re losing each week.

  6. Val says:

    He was so bland as Robin
    And then he acted like he was the only actor in tv show to ever been written out and esp fro a character who did NOTHING on the show.
    Wow he was asked nicely… like he was wronged or something lol
    and no i am not those silly sq person. just found him dull

  7. TJ says:

    So I just binged the first four episodes…. and I like it. So does this mean it will get cancelled? How are the ratings?