Will You Roll With NBC's Ironside?

Get More: Premieres, Recaps

IronsideWhat doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, especially if you have pecs of steel like Detective Robert Ironside (Blair Underwood, Dirty Sexy Money). The titular cop won’t let his paraplegia stop him from doing his job — but did the premise of NBC’s new police procedural (which premiered Wednesday at 10/9c) grab you enough to stop you from tuning out?

Based on the classic 1967 Raymond Burr series, this update, set in New York City, combines a straight procedural format with flashbacks to Ironside’s life before his debilitating injury. In the pilot, Ironside and his team investigate the involvement of a seemingly corrupt banker (guest-star Brian D’Arcy James, Smash) in the death of a promising young employee.

RELATEDb | Fall TV Grid: What’s on When? And Versus What?

Ironside’s hand-picked team (one of the perks of his post-injury settlement with the NYPD) is composed of a trio of attractive and recognizable cops: trust-fund baby Teddy (Neal Bledsoe, Smash), street-smart Holly (Spencer Grammer, Greek) and underwritten Virgil (Pablo Schreiber, Orange Is the New Black). Ironside also must contend with by-the-books boss Ed (Kenneth Choi, Sons of Anarchy) and former partner Gary (Brent Sexton, The Killing), whose incessant guilt for failing to stop that injurious bullet is driving Ironside away.

The series relies on expected procedural tropes — in the pilot alone, the show pulls the classic “rule-abiding Captain tries to interfere with maverick Detective’s shady police work, which ends up being necessary to solve the case” move twice. Underwood’s undeniable charm (and good looks), however, make the episode pop. If the series can make good use of its talented young co-stars, particularly by giving Schreiber more to do, and not sacrifice character for procedure, then Ironside may be able to find its place in the crowded cop canon.

But enough about what we thought: What was your take on Ironside? Grade the episode via the poll below, then hit the comments to back up your choice!



Comments (60)

  • Thanks NBC for moving Chicago Fire to Tuesdays so Nashville gets help in ratings!!

    Comment by Boiler – October 2, 2013 08:13 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Please don’t bother with further recaps. I can’t imagine anyone will be watching after that dreadful pilot episode.

    Comment by Allen – October 2, 2013 08:15 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • They’d have done better to give the role to Chi McBride. Blair Underwood is ratings poison. JMO

      Comment by Jovi – October 3, 2013 07:36 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • I’m not really a fan of Blair, I must say, and I didn’t watch the entire episode but what I did see I didn’t really care for. This is one I won’t be watching. It didn’t grab me at all.

        Comment by Kim R – October 3, 2013 07:46 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • And so is Chi McBride!

        Comment by LOL – October 3, 2013 08:12 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I don’t know if it was dreadful; I didn’t watch it. From the previews I saw, it seemed to me that they were taking Ironside’s personality to a place it should not go. I am old enough to remember Raymond Burr in the role and as much as I like Blair Underwood, one of the comments in the preview indicated that he was not going to be the intelligent, thoughtful detective that I used to love. It would have pained me to see him played any differently than originally portrayed.

      Comment by Mary S – October 3, 2013 01:24 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I give my grade of Ironside an D. Guess we’re wondering if Blair Underwood is going to have another fail series just like he was with The Event and LAX (both series were on NBC).

    Comment by Flacco Kaepernick – October 2, 2013 08:20 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Wheels and The Legman!!!

    Comment by Darth Pablo – October 2, 2013 08:24 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • “Will you roll with Ironside” get it? Because he’s in a wheelchair, that rolls on wheels.HILARIOUS! Seriously TV line, you guys are too funny. What’s next? “Did you eat up Super Fun Night?” because she’s fat…

    Comment by Eurisko – October 2, 2013 08:31 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Actually “roll” would work for that show, too.

      Comment by Jovi – October 3, 2013 07:38 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Good grief people. So quick to jump to failure. Sheesh. A lot of shows are slow out of the gate with bad pilots only to become successful. People don’t even give shows a chance anymore.

    Comment by Wrstlgirl – October 2, 2013 08:31 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Few shows with awful pilots improve much, plain and simple. And this one was horrid!

      Comment by Chris – October 2, 2013 09:59 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Could not possibly agree more. I lasted all of 15 minutes before deciding I’d be better off watching paint dry or my dog grooming himself.

        Comment by Eran – October 3, 2013 02:50 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
        • This. So much this.

          Comment by Eli – October 3, 2013 06:48 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • It’s funny reading all these negative comments when viewers on the tvguide board loved it. There’s not one negative comment over there.

        Comment by wrstlgirl – October 3, 2013 06:51 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • That is a lie. Look at Chicago Fire.

        Comment by dude – October 3, 2013 08:16 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
        • You can think of only ONE example? Wow, that’s sure impressive and shows off your TV knowledge! And the Chicago Fire pilot was merely mediocre, not terrible, so it doesn’t qualify anyway.

          Comment by Chris – October 3, 2013 10:12 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
          • That’s your opinion Chris, many people thought the Chicago Fire pilot was “terrible” so please don’t pretend to speak for everyone.

            Comment by wrstlgirl – October 3, 2013 10:19 AM PDT  
  • Saw the pilot on-line and gave it a C. Its neither great or bad. If there is nothing on, I’d waych, but not add it to my dvr.

    Comment by GeoDiva – October 2, 2013 08:40 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I will watch for Pablo alone; but I thought the whole cast was good and the writing average. Still, I give this one a B, and I’ll keep watching and hoping the writing improves and that the characters, especially PS, will get some good material.

    Comment by Jenna – October 2, 2013 09:02 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Too bad they didn’t set it in San Francisco (like the original.)

    Comment by Morisot – October 2, 2013 09:08 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Probably set there to facilitate combo stories with svu, just a thought

      Comment by Saabgirlatx – October 2, 2013 10:29 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I only watched this for Blair Underwood. I would watch that guy read the phone book.

    Comment by Jules – October 2, 2013 10:18 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I concur! He’s beautiful. Had to watch it twice. Once in awe of his beauty. Twice to watch the actual show…

      Comment by Marilyn Esterson – October 7, 2013 03:14 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I didn’t see any compelling reason for the captain to let Ironside to get away with the stuff he pulls. He is a string of lawsuits just waiting to happen (Seriously, shooting the hostage?!). He’s a loose cannon at best, and a major liability at worst. To add to this, I decided that if you just replaced Ironside with Elliot Stabler, you’d be watching an episode of SVU. I didn’t really find anything to make this show stand out from the pack of a trillion other police procedurals.

    Comment by Dreamrose – October 2, 2013 11:16 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Ah Dreamrose, you are making a classical mistake. You are actually using your brain while watching a network show. Everyone knows you are supposed to shut your brain down while watching network tv… ;)

      Comment by Eli – October 3, 2013 06:54 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Haha, I know! I also noticed that Ironside’s guilt-ridden ex-partner Gary was played by Brent Sexton, who also played Charlie Crews’s guilt-ridden ex-partner Bobby in “Life” about five years ago…

        Comment by Dreamrose – October 3, 2013 07:07 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I loved the episode.

    Comment by Ange – October 3, 2013 02:48 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Amen.

      Comment by Marilyn Esterson – October 7, 2013 03:16 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • So bad and deserves a quick cancellation!

    Comment by DavidSask – October 3, 2013 03:09 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I liked the character. I liked the concept. I wasn’t fond of the story. The story seemed to be trying too hard. It was forced rather then flowing. I’ll give it my typical 3 tries for a series I’m on the fence about.

    Comment by Badpenny – October 3, 2013 06:04 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I rather liked it, actually. Blair Underwood is always a good thing. Also ohai WIlliam Lewis (seriously, Pablo’s been everywhere lately and it’s a bit hilarious). What’s a bit disappointing is that you didn’t recap SVU. I thought you were going to start doing that again, but noooo.

    Comment by Zoe – October 3, 2013 06:24 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I love him and agree – he’s always a good thing. Think, if given the material, he’s an excellent actor. Really really like Pablo. He plays a great maniac. A smiling maniac. He IS everywhere lately! I really enjoy the show. This is a tough crowd…

      Comment by Marilyn Esterson – October 7, 2013 03:20 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I really liked the show. I thought it was different from other shows. I absolutely love Blair Underwood.

    Comment by Maddie – October 3, 2013 06:36 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I don’t say this often, but either your tv watching experience is limited to the Disney Channel and TLC, or you’re an idiot.

      This show is about as run-of-the-mill procedural as a show can get. The only thing setting it apart is the ridiculous premise of the lead being in a wheelchair. This show might have been decent 20 years ago, but in todays tv universe, this show is pathetic.

      Comment by Eli – October 3, 2013 06:53 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Just mean, pure and simple.

        Comment by wrstlgirl – October 3, 2013 07:01 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Finally! Some positive comments about Blair. He’s got it going on from every angle. I will be beyond dissappointed if this show gets canceled.

      Comment by Marilyn Esterson – October 7, 2013 03:22 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I would probably watch it if it was set in San Francisco like the original. I’m sick of all these shows set in NYC. So lazy and unoriginal.

    Comment by Bob Timms – October 3, 2013 08:00 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Too much man pain.

    Comment by Meghan – October 3, 2013 08:44 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Needed more Spencer Grammer. Can’t believe someone so charming is the daughter of an ignoramus like Kelsey.

    Comment by Zach – October 3, 2013 09:23 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • STOP WITH THE REMAKES AND REBOOTS.

    Comment by Really – October 3, 2013 10:56 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Raymond Burr is rolling over in his grave. Attempting to remake IRONSIDE is like trying to remake PERRY MASON. Neither can be done because Burr made them both so iconic that anything else is just a pale imitation.

    Comment by J W – October 3, 2013 11:05 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • It was ok… but this new Ironside is a JERKOFF!

    Comment by Marco – October 3, 2013 11:09 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Blah, blah, blah, maverick, blah, blah, blah, wheelchair, blah, blah, blah, procedural. Yawn.

    Maybe one one-hundredth as good as the original.

    Comment by Sheldon W. – October 3, 2013 12:29 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • TV execs need to learn…. if you’re going to remake a beloved show from the past…. STICK TO THE ORGINAL and quit trying to remake it into some hip modern-day cool show young people will watch. THAT’S NOT THE AUDIENCE YOU’RE AFTER if you’re remaking a show from 30 years ago.

    Comment by Mark Berryman – October 3, 2013 12:40 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Remember your audience. Blair Underwood was good in LA Law, but Raymond Burr made the Ironside character work for all of us. Stop remaking the same “in name only” shows. TV is I going the way of cloning the movies,

    Comment by John Fitz – October 3, 2013 01:31 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I liked it a lot. Hope it sticks around. I am not even a huge Blair Underwood fan, but he has some serious acting chops and I admire the skill. I also like that he is kinda like the “House” version of a cop. I like mixing it up and not the same old stuff.

    Comment by Missy – October 3, 2013 02:48 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Ironside is a really bad cop. I imagine most of his cases are thrown out on a technicality because of all the laws he breaks.

    Comment by JAMANDAFAN – October 3, 2013 03:21 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I got through about 12 minutes and shut if off. As far as I was concerned, there was nothing redeeming about it. I am old enough to remember the old Ironside, so clearly I am not in the target audience. This show is a complete waste of some excellent talent. I hope it either improves dramatically, for those who will continue to watch, or they cancel it, so the talent can move on to better projects. I totally agree this was like the character Elliot Stabler, who I felt was too violent and over the top, in a wheelchair. And it was Ironside in name only. It is a shame that it used nothing good about the original in this current attempt.

    Comment by empp – October 6, 2013 07:16 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • 12 minutes into it a man of his decent is coaching hockey! Too much …

    Comment by Walter – October 7, 2013 07:19 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I had just seen it once, having not realized when it was on…and now they are cancelling it, just as I set my DVR to automatically record it so I don’t miss any more episodes. I am now down to one NBC offering that I watch, and it will be off the air soon, also. I don’t know when, but I know that they only ordered a short season of SVU and they are already setting up the finale. Munch left last week, Olivia has FINALLY been offered a promotion…they are moving people around…creating an acceptable finale for the series. And then I will have no reason to tune to this Never Been Clever network again.

      Comment by Mary S – October 19, 2013 05:07 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Walter, your comment makes no sense unless you are trying to say “descent”- and then it still makes no sense. Unless you are trying to say that a man in a wheelchair is not the first coach you’d consider for any sport…OH! are you making a racist comment about a black man coaching hockey? Got to give you credit for the effort, it just fell flat. On its face. Like you.

      Comment by Mary S – October 19, 2013 05:18 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Cancelling Ironside??? Another good drama with excellent acting (like The Killing) gone. 6 mil. viewers not enough, NBC??? Please…..

    Comment by Kate Farrell – October 18, 2013 03:50 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I Can’t Believe Is That There Are Actually People At NBC That Come Up With Great Shows Such As The IRONSIDE Remake.Which Canceling The Show After 3 Episodes Was The Wrong Move! There Are Many More Viewers Other Than Me That Are Disgusted With Watching,Sorry For Calling It This,But Women Oriented TV Shows.We Like A Good Action & Drama Show Which In My Opinion Ironside Was.Like Another Person Comented Isn’t 6 Million Viewers Enough? I Guess Not! All I Can Say Is That It Is Very Upsetting.

    Comment by Brian Donnelly – October 19, 2013 11:47 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I liked the new series Ironside but I believe it is going off the air because viewers can’t stand seeing a strong black man with brains being displayed on television. There is a lot of insecurities concerning black males in America among the larger majority population.

    Comment by JR – October 19, 2013 03:07 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • You do have to wonder. . . here’s a black dude who was by no means the affable Negro-next- door, posed standing catty-corner behind a white guy for the poster. Just saying.

      Comment by Jill – November 14, 2013 05:00 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • It wasn’t bad. It was tough and gritty, I admit. But it seems foolhardy to junk a show after four episodes with a cast that strong. China Beach had the lamest entire first season ever, but ABC stuck with it and the writers clued in that the cast could handle better material. But NBC is always running on to the next big thing, which never seems to come.

    Comment by Jill – November 14, 2013 04:56 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Jill, right you are, along with many other good series trys…!!!

      Comment by Kate Farrell – November 14, 2013 05:15 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • N(ever) B(een) C(lever) has a habit of getting rid of good shows while keeping trash. Their demographic is 18-34 and everything is geared for that group. It has gotten to the point that I am afraid to get too involved with any show, because as soon as I really start liking it, they cancel it. The only remaining show that I watch is SVU, and I have heard several rumors that it will be cancelled soon, also.

        Comment by Mary S – November 14, 2013 06:46 PM PDT  Reply To This Post

Leave a Reply

Comments on TVLine.com are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't frakkin' curse, and be gone with your offers of discount leather goods. Talk smart about TV!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s