First Look Video: Watch Amy Sherman-Palladino's New ABC Family Dramedy Bunheads Now!

Get More: First Look, Video

Lace up your toe shoes and take a few warm-up pirouettes, TVLine viewers — you’ve got a chance to see ABC Family’s new dance-centric drama, Bunheads, before it premieres (June 11, 9/8c)!

Amy Sherman-Palladino’s long-awaited post-Gilmore Girls series (we’re choosing to forget about The Return of Jezebel James) follows Michelle (Broadway darling Sutton Foster), a Vegas showgirl who moves to California after marrying Hubbell (Ferris Bueller’s Day Off’s Alan Ruck). But Hubbell’s disapproving mom, Fanny (GG doyenne Kelly Bishop), proves she can be quite a pain in the tutu. As Michelle struggles to find her place, she bonds with a bunch of students at Fanny’s dance studio — the titular “bunheads.”

Click this link and use the case-sensitive code TVLineBunheads for your sneak peek. But do it quickly: There are a limited number of views, and the code expires on Sunday, May 27. Once you’ve watched, hit the comments below and let us know what you think!

Comments (68)

  • You appear to be outside the US……………Seriously ABC people ALL over the world watch your shows, and buy your shows DVDs, least you could do is let us stream promos on your site! Jeeeez!

    Comment by Kate McKenna (@Katemadeleine) – May 21, 2012 04:11 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • +1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      at least warn us in the article

      Comment by noa – May 21, 2012 04:45 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Why should YOU get access to OUR shows? That’s pretty presumptuous of you to want OUR entertainment for free. You have NO right to it.

      Comment by Chris – May 21, 2012 09:03 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Nice attitude, no wonder other countries think like they do about us. Apparently you don’t realize most show play outside the US and that is how OUR movie/ tv studios make their money. Chill.

        Comment by Dawnmac – May 21, 2012 09:34 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • The thing is US networks have to clear the shows to air in other countries, which includes clearing all music included in the show also. Sometimes other countries don’t want to have US shows air there because it takes away from the shows native to that country. So its not necessarily ABC’s fault.

      Comment by A – May 21, 2012 09:03 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • It doesn’t even let us watch in Canada, okay. And most American shows air the same time here.

        Comment by mirleival – May 21, 2012 06:22 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Most tv networks are like this. My best friend moved out of the country and the only sites she doesn’t have problems with are things like MTV and Comedy Central.

      Comment by Tee – May 21, 2012 09:24 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Yes I’m outside the US… But I love American shows. I wish the US networks would understand.

    Comment by Allie – May 21, 2012 04:35 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Why should YOU get access to OUR shows? That’s pretty presumptuous of you to want OUR entertainment for free. You have NO right to it.

      Comment by Chris – May 21, 2012 09:02 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Wow.. How arrogant of you. These shows also made revenue overseas. And by the way, it’s not Y OUR SHOWS, it’s those network shows. You didn’t help making them. And you get to watch it for free anyway. So stop being an arrogant a**hole

        Comment by myc0nf35510n – May 21, 2012 10:02 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • nice. For your information, all of what you call your shows are making a lot of money overseas (in my tiny country, a show is bought by at least 2 channels) + dvds,….. So imagine what it makes for the whole Europe! Add South America, Asia,… The production of an US show takes that into account too. I don’t want entertainment for free (btw, I don’t think you actually pay for ABC Family neither, and I’m ready to see commercials), I just think that they should give access to teasers in that case.
        Another thing: when there’s a buzz about one show in Europe (because Europeans are watching it online), the channels here buy this show because of the buzz around it. So, sorry to make american entertainment economy works overseas.
        And by the way, I have lived on the east coast (chill, it didn’t cost anything to the US economy; it was a student exchange so an American citizen was in Europe), and gladfully I haven’t met people thinking like you!

        Comment by Allie – May 21, 2012 11:26 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
        • It’s not even just overseas. They don’t even work in Canada. And we air the same stuff, practically, that America does. It really doesn’t make sense. 33 million people here, and we mostly watch American network shows.

          Comment by mirleival – May 21, 2012 06:24 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Of course, that’s nonsense. Most of these videos are promos for shows that will air in most markets around the world. Beyond that, pretty much anyone that speaks English can get access in various ways – free, paid, or illegal – to anything they want to watch. Restricting the promos is stupid in this day and age.

        Comment by tarc – May 21, 2012 11:43 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
        • Sorry, by ‘speaks English’, I just mean who would bother with unsubtitled English language TV if you didn’t speak English.

          Comment by tarc – May 21, 2012 12:37 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • You know what it doesn’t seem fair, but The Avengers came out abroad first and we had to wait to see that, and that was an American film, so it happens here too.

      Comment by Barre – May 21, 2012 12:52 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • just proxy it and then watch. just one more ring to hoop through

    Comment by ivaddj – May 21, 2012 04:52 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Kelly Bishop!!! <3

    Comment by Epip. – May 21, 2012 05:02 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • If you live in Canada, it’s not any of the networks blocking the content, it’s our lovely CRTC. It’s a licensing issue. Just google how to get around this by using a proxy to view this content.

    Comment by Lilly – May 21, 2012 05:33 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Hmm, I think this has real potential. I didn’t see the end coming, nice plot twist.

    Comment by Nicole – May 21, 2012 05:57 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Pretty decent pilot. I’d tune in to see the next ep. Glad I got to see it, thanks!

    Comment by Tee – May 21, 2012 06:01 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I really didn’t expect what happened! The show has a lot of potential and I really really really love Kelly Bishop!

    Comment by Kylee – May 21, 2012 06:12 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I thoroughly enjoyed the pilot. I’m really looking forward to this series. It should help with my summer withdrawal from “Bones” (same night… different network).

    Comment by Ros – May 21, 2012 06:28 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • What?!? I did not expect that ending! I was wondering where the show was going to go… I guess I know. I’ll watch!

    Comment by Stephanie – May 21, 2012 06:46 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Think the pilot is quite messy – an extra 10 minutes would have been great, but OMG, Amy Sherman-Palladino is AMAZING. Can’t wait for rest!

    Comment by Guest – May 21, 2012 06:51 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I absolutely loved it! The dance scene at the end was so much fun…until it wasn’t.

    Comment by Allyson – May 21, 2012 07:04 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Loved it! Can’t wait to see the next episode, and I loved seeing so many faces from GG.

    Comment by Suzanne – May 21, 2012 07:10 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I actually saw the ending coming. Because…(SPOILER ALERT!)….

    How long could they keep Alan Ruck? It made sense to me that he would either leave or die. She needed a reason to stay other than the fact that they were married. And Amy Sherman-Palladino has always been a bit literal…Michelle wore a black dress that looked like she was going to a wake instead of a wedding reception. I did like it, though. I’ll watch this summer and see what happens.

    Comment by Rachel – May 21, 2012 07:25 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • If he’s dead, that’s actually a reason for her to leave. The only thing keeping her in town is the husband.

      Comment by Chris – May 21, 2012 10:10 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Well, not really. She has no job, no family, no friends. Where would she go? And her being married to Hubbel was/is the key to keep her there. She now owns the house, the shoe store (factory?). Who knows, she may be pregnant after that one time they did it.

        I thought the pilot was fantastic. I don’t know about anyone else, but the first words out of Michelle’s (Sutton Foster’s) mouth I immediately recognized as ASP. Also I laughed when I saw GG’s Drella as her prostitute neighbor. When Kelly Bishop showed up I was overjoyed. Then when Gypsy showed up in the dress store I started to get a little teary, and on top of it Sam Phillps music completely tipped me over the edge. Oh, I hope this show stays around a long time.

        Comment by Melly – May 23, 2012 06:31 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
        • My eyes dampened ever so slightly too. Watching Bunheads was like finally getting to visit with old friends again. Good work Amy, may you have a long long run!

          Comment by surfkitty – May 24, 2012 01:50 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Terrific pilot! I’ll definitely watch the show. Kelly Bishop was soooo great!! Loved the dancing! Loved the writing, Sutton Foster, the girls. I see real potential for this show.

    Comment by Kat – May 21, 2012 07:39 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • i liked it i would watch next ep to see what happens

    Comment by mark – May 21, 2012 07:46 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • First off you guys are very awesome for letting us view this. Now on to the show, I was really loving it and then the end… WHAT? Is this like a common theme with shows about ballet to do that kind of thing? This is the second show to do that, sheesh. But I did dove that they snuck some Gilmore Girls alums in like Gypsy (Rose Abdoo) .

    Comment by Paige – May 21, 2012 07:49 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Wow. the ending was really unique. I did not see that coming. I’ll definitely check out ep. 2!

    Comment by sk – May 21, 2012 08:07 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Why would you forget about Jezebel James? That show was really good.

    Comment by madhatter360 – May 21, 2012 08:20 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • It sucked butt, actually.

      Comment by Chris – May 21, 2012 10:36 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Was it just me, or did I catch a familiar “la la la la” during a scene transition? :-) I may watch *just* for all the Gilmoresian touches. The show seems like it will be decent enough, though it looks like ASP has created another female-heavy universe. I had read that the role of Luke was originally that of a female cafe owner, but ASP changed it because early feedback called the show too estrogen-heavy. She might have the same problem here.

    Comment by mm – May 21, 2012 08:59 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • :) Sam Phillips or the “la la la” artist was indeed featured twice in the episode. (At least, twice that I caught.)

      Given that we’re only in the pilot of introducing the cast and it’s centered around ballerinas, it’s not a bit surprising that we’re lacking in the testosterone department. Give it a few episodes and I’m sure they’ll start introducing new characters.

      Comment by Stacy – May 21, 2012 08:04 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I hope other people liked it as much as I did, because I’d really love to see this show thrive. There will never be another Gilmore Girls, but the charm level of this show is definitely in the same ball park. Love ASP and all the talent associated with this show. Hopefully it’ll be a hit.

    Comment by Jordan Gruchy – May 21, 2012 09:03 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • LOVED IT!!!! Loved the dialogue, the pacing, the quirky characters… This is a good one!!

    Comment by Laura – May 21, 2012 09:38 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I like the concept. As a ballerina, it’s one of the more well-done representations of being a dancer. Some of the acting is over done though. I think that as long as they get rid of Truly it could do really well.

    Comment by Katy Johnson (@katy_j314) – May 21, 2012 10:14 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I suspect Truly will be this show’s Kirk

      Comment by Sheila – May 21, 2012 09:03 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • ***********************************SPOILER ALERT*********************************************************

    OK, now that, that is out of the way. Holy Crap. That ending took what looked to be an amusing family show and kicked it to a whoooole other level. Yanking my brain away from the ending for a minute. Oh, how I’ve missed Amy’s rapid fire witty dialogue. The first big moment for me was when I yelled “CAMERON” when Hubble walked onto the screen. They should never ever use that guitar rift from Gilmore Girls again. I appreciate the nod but it totally jarred me to see Kelly Bishop and hear that Carol King croon. This show needs to establish it’s self stat and throwing overt references like that into the mix is not going to help do that. Keeping it subtle will make it endearing rather than pandering. More like Once Upon A Time does. It was really nice to see so much of Stars Hollow in Paradise. Even Drella as a hooker was fantastic. I see big potential in the relationship with the ballet girls. It’s like we’re getting the Miss Patty story instead of Lorelei. They’ve found some extremely talented young girls for the class. Back to that fantastically unexpected ending. I think that they may have showed their hand a little too soon. If it had been a 2 hour premiere it probably would have worked better. Right now if Hubble is dead there is no real reason for her to stay there with another hour and more time with Hubble it would feel more established. Anything else will feel a little forced. If he is in a coma then Amy is even more sadistic to her characters than usual in this show. The only way it would be even remotely realistic is if she is pregnant… once again making Amy a sadist. That could be fascinating though. After watching this I get the distinct feeling that Amy as no idea how to write a functional relationship as a main part of a show. The only time she shows a couple together is when their having problems. Happy couples that support and help each other with life’s problems are apparently boring for her. Hubble could have really helped Michelle to change her life and make her happy.
    I’d really like to to tune in for the rest of the season to see where they go with this but after their crappy treatment of Make it or Break it I decided not to watch ABC Family shows anymore. So now I’m in a moral dilemma. Overall I’d say it was a pretty darn good pilot. Nowhere near as good as Gilmore Girls (which remains the best pilot I’ve ever seen) but still better than a lot of pilots I’ve been watching recently.

    Comment by Lauren Kirsch – May 21, 2012 10:29 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • The pilot clearly established that the house belongs to Hubble, not his mother. Upon his death, it will be inherited by his wife. Given that Michelle feels she has no life to return to, may feel she can help these girls, and presumably not wanting to turn her mother-in-law out on the street, I’m sure she’ll find a reasonable excuse to stay.

      Gilmore Girls may have had a good pilot, but the show still improved in spades especially through the first season. I’m hoping the same will be true of this ASP show.

      Comment by Stacy – May 21, 2012 08:09 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Do you get the impression that even if the house was legally hers that Michelle would ever, in a million years claim that house after being married to Hubble for 24 hours? She is not an acquisitive harpy and she already felt guilty about marrying Hubble in the first place. She would have to be a selfish soulless bit(# to take a dime from Hubble let alone the house.

        Comment by Lauren Kirsch – May 21, 2012 09:36 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
        • Um, she took a very expensive watch from a man she called a stalker and made fun of. I’m not saying she would take the house, but she’s definitely not one of those people who’s too proud to.

          Comment by lara – May 25, 2012 12:27 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Thanks for sharing with us. I liked it and will be watching it as it airs. I, too, noticed the musical changes between scenes reminiscent of Gilmore Girls. The dialogue is fast and snappy and I thought that the characters fell into that a little better as the episode progressed. Kelly Bishop is wonderful! As a Friday Night Lights fan it was nice to see Mindy Riggins in another role.

    Comment by Meghan – May 21, 2012 10:41 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I thought it was terrific and I will absolutely watch it again, however what kinda bothered me was some of the GG touches were too much/ too reminiscent: the la la la’s, the small town with the quirky residents, so many of the same cast – Gypsy! I think it doesn’t need to repeat any themes, it has enough going for it on it’s own.

    Comment by Colleeeeeeeen – May 21, 2012 10:48 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • decent pilot.. the end is what is going to make me want to watch it again!

    Comment by loulzb – May 21, 2012 10:57 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I thought the town was like Stars Hollow on the beach, and the music has a very Gilmore Girls feel, I’m not sure that I love or hat that she is going back to the well. I am a huge Sutton Foster fan, and would probably watch anything even if it was terrible, but this has promise, I’m just sad about the end.

    Comment by Sabrina – May 21, 2012 11:50 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Thanks so much for the preview. I didn’t realize I was going to get the full episode… So excited for this show. I still miss Gilmore Girls, and this show seems like it might fill that void a little! I was so shocked by the ending though. Not sure that was necessary, but anxious to see more.

    Comment by tlcinvt – May 21, 2012 12:00 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • This show is soo great!!! It’s so similar to Gilmore Girls, yet so different! I love the alumni!!! I can’t wait to watch more!!!

    Comment by Tookie – May 21, 2012 02:48 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I absolutely loved it. I missed Kelly Bishop. It just needs a Sookie like character. I can’t wait for the episodes to air!

    Comment by Anna – May 21, 2012 02:58 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Watched it on Youtube….Looks good. The main has a similar attitude to that of Lorelai, if that is true, it will be FANTASTIC!!!

    Comment by Mel – May 21, 2012 03:52 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • She has the same sarcastic sort of tone! I love it!!

      Comment by Tookie – May 21, 2012 04:04 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • This show is going to be a hit. Can’t wait for the rest of the episodes this summer.

    Comment by Melissa Polidura – May 21, 2012 04:26 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I thought it was really cute! But the ending…OMFG!

    Comment by Susan – May 21, 2012 04:30 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Definitely worth a second look. i love kelly bishop and suttton foster seems interesting..she’s not lauren graham..but she’s got a similar vibe. too bad about Alan Ruck. i love him.

    Comment by Mehvash – May 21, 2012 05:03 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I loved it ask well. It def. has a “Gilmore” vibe to it, which is great, and the characters, esp. the main one, are very personable and make you want to see what happens. And yes, that ending what surprising!

    Comment by angelblue1772 – May 21, 2012 05:09 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I love love love Sutton Foster, she is amazing and so wonderful. The rest of the show was ok… very ABC family in tone and acting abilities. I will watch it because I adore S.F.

    Comment by Katie – May 21, 2012 05:47 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Me too! I hope they find excuses for her to sing, she has such a great voice!

      Comment by Sheila – May 21, 2012 09:05 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I have definitely missed a good Amy Sherman-Palladino dialogue on my tv screen as of late. The ending really was the major hook for me that has me wanting to see what happens next! Sutton Foster is amazing, and I really appreciate how Kelly Bishop can still have here wonderful ‘Emily Gilmore’ quips and attitudes while doing shots at a bar! I cannot wait to see where it goes from here!

    Comment by Arielle A. – May 22, 2012 06:34 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • A+

    Comment by Kristina Kada – May 22, 2012 05:05 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I love Amy Sherman Palladino. I loved Gilmore Girls and still watch it sometimes. I’m glad this was around and will definitely be watching the rest of the season.

    ***Spoiler Territory****

    That having been said I do wish that she would have kept Alan Ruck for a couple more episodes. Develop the relationship and the town and then done the big twist. It makes me wonder how they’re going to keep her there. She better not be pregnant. Since it was so unexpected I find it hard to believe that she’s in his will.

    Frankly, I wish they could have kept him the whole season. Developing Michelle’s ability to love him and trust him would have been really interesting and different for ASP.

    Comment by Sarah – May 22, 2012 09:32 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I’m so excited that Amy has a new show! She’s definitely unique. I’ll be waiting anxiously to see what happens next.. good cliff hanger. Not to mention I love dance so this is just for me! :)

    Comment by Monica – May 23, 2012 10:48 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Loved it! I thought, especially for a pilot, that it was fantastic. It has awesome potential. Love the Gilmore Girls vibe but hope in the future it isn’t so on the nose about it. That ending was truly shocking – kudos for having the guts to do that in the first episode. I can’t wait to find out how/why Michelle will stay. Was so excited to see Kelly Rowland and the girl who plays Mindy Riggins – as well as the other GG alumni. Love that ABC Family is now airing legitimate shows that adults can love.

    Comment by Amy – May 23, 2012 04:44 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Dresses & shoes? Anyone else think of Star Hollow “candy & flowers”?

    Comment by rg – June 6, 2012 11:43 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Sorry. StarS Hollow. Love ASP

    Comment by rg – June 6, 2012 11:45 PM PDT  Reply To This Post

Leave a Reply

Comments on are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't frakkin' curse, and be gone with your offers of discount leather goods. Talk smart about TV!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s