Ashton Kutcher Confirms Two and a Half Men Gig, But Insists 'I Can't Replace Charlie Sheen'

Get More: Casting News, News, Scoop

CBS is officially confirming that Ashton Kutcher has finalized a deal to replace Charlie Sheen on Two and a Half Men — a suggestion that was first proposed on this site three months ago.

Sure he was one of a half-dozen names we floated, but we still deserve props, dammit!

The Kutcher news comes two days after reported that Hugh Grant rejected a lucrative offer to join CBS’ No. 1 sitcom.

“I can’t wait to get to work with this ridiculously talented 2.5 team and I believe we can fill the stage with laughter that will echo in viewers’ homes,” said Kutcher in a statement. “I can’t replace Charlie Sheen but I’m going to work my ass off to entertain the hell out of people!”

We are so lucky to have someone as talented, joyful and just plain remarkable as Ashton joining our family,” enthused Men creator Chuck Lorre. “Added to that is the deep sigh of relief knowing that our family stays together.  If I was any happier, it’d be illegal.”

This marks Kutcher’s first series gig since That ’70s Show went off the air in 2006. Details regarding his Men character have not been disclosed. Chances are CBS is holding that piece of news until upfront day on May 18.

What does Sheen have to say about all this? “Kutcher is a sweetheart and a brilliant comedic performer … Oh wait, so am I!”
 he cracked to TMZ, before adding, “Enjoy the show America. Enjoy seeing a 2.0 in the demo every Monday, [Warner Bros.].”

Thoughts? Has Men traded up… or down?

Comments (267)

  • Sorry but no thanks…

    the only reason the show worked (for his very large fanbase) was because of the relationship between all the characters, the only way the change could work was if they just chaged the actor, but not the character

    without the Charlie character, there´s no reason for the other ones to be the way they used to be (without his older brother, THE OWNER OF THE HOSE, Alan has no need to be the underdog, etc)

    so, if they change one character, they will change all of them

    Comment by STARK – May 12, 2011 09:20 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • This is hilarious. I might actually watch the show now.

    Comment by Dani – May 12, 2011 09:34 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • My first thought was “yuck.” But I’ll at least watch a few episodes before I come to any conclusions. I don’t think Ashton is half the actor Sheen or Hugh Grant is, and I never would have cast him at all but it just might work.

    Comment by Bob – May 12, 2011 09:45 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I think ashton will do well on this show….I wasn’t a big fan before of men but i’m going to check it out now I think. I’m curios as to how they will fit him in the show.

    Comment by shanna – May 12, 2011 10:20 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • This is AWESOME news!

    First i thought “wtf, Hugh Grant??” then they flip it around and get freaking MICHAEL KELSO, now that’s WINNING.

    Comment by Penner – May 12, 2011 10:22 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I know. Brilliant! I can see him as a womanizer and yet be immature enough to interact with Jake to Alan’s dismay. Perfect.

      Comment by Templar – May 13, 2011 07:10 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I might actually watch this show now!

    Comment by Mandy – May 12, 2011 10:32 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Trading down
    I like both as actors but no one can replace charlie in this role,
    His art imitates his life! he’s a natural in this role

    Comment by john schonewille – May 12, 2011 10:34 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • GOD! Oh, god! Please, nobody let me hear it when it crashes, please? It’s gonna be so friggin ugly, I don’t want to remember that sound.

    Comment by godzilla_foil – May 12, 2011 10:44 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Clearly uncle Charlie is in rehab overseas and cousin Kelso is binning a place to stay after burning down his own.

    Comment by Jay – May 12, 2011 11:40 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Bad choice, one less show to watch on CBS.

    Comment by Harry – May 12, 2011 11:54 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I personally think its a big bonus ashton joining 2 and a half men,hes movies are good, and that 70s show was awesome.And all the talk of ashton unable carrying the show is ignorant, charlie sheen didnt carry the show,he was simply a part of the show,just like ashton will be.
    The writers are what makes two and a half men funny,and with the talent of writers they have im sure ashton will do a awesome job.
    I wasnt the biggest fan of the show but i did like it and i thought it was getting a bit dull,so, thumbs up for the introduction of ashton joining two and a half men, i can not wait.

    Comment by shane – May 13, 2011 12:07 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Ashton Kutcher can’t act. They really made a mistake by not casting Hugh Grant.

    Comment by maggie – May 13, 2011 12:43 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Gross. Sinking ship, yes?

    Comment by Cat – May 13, 2011 12:45 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I don’t watch the show, but I will say I’m more inclined to check it out with Kutcher on board. He was always hilarious as Kelso, and if he brings his charm to this new character it could be good. It’ll be hard to tell until it actually happens on screen.

    Comment by Melody – May 13, 2011 01:07 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Definitively a trade down.

    Sure, it´s difficult to replace Charlie Sheen but Kutcher? His sitcom qualitfication various between 70 shows and jakeass!

    I don´t know, did they ask Emilio Estevez as well? If he might be the best if you will go on with the same charme.

    But the coice for Kutcher shows me that there going to start it up totally different. I won´t watch it.

    Comment by Heiko – May 13, 2011 01:50 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Great! He is definitely better than Sheen! And this is really something fresh and new!

    Comment by Medet – May 13, 2011 02:03 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Really? Ashton? REALLY????

    I hope Mister Lorre has some tricks up his sleeve to make this work … cause I don’t see how this could and would work.

    REALLY? ASHTON *bleeping* KUTCHER? To replace Charlie?

    I predict an Epic Fail this autumn!

    Comment by Jake – May 13, 2011 02:15 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Charlie stays in England with Rose.(thus leaving a chance for him to return if this mess ever gets fixed.) He sells his house to Ashton’s character ( an enterprising young business man who created a facebook like website and sold it for billions) with the provision that Alan and Jake get to stay. As a cherry on the sunday, Evelyn sells the house for Charlie and doesn’t tell Alan, thus earning a huge commission and the hatred of her youngest son forever.

    Comment by Liz – May 13, 2011 03:17 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Well, I now know what I won’t be watching …sure miss Charlie no matter how wacked out he may be….

    Comment by Mary – May 13, 2011 04:03 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I think this is one of the biggest mistakes that CBS has ever made, I’m sure that the show will be cancelled with in one season of Ashton being on it. This is going to kill the show. CBS should be doing what they can to get Charlie back on the show, if they want to keep it as the number 1 sitcom they are going to have to. Ashton does not have enough talent to pull off acting on this show.

    Comment by Caperbaby – May 13, 2011 05:08 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I think Ashton Kutcher will turn out to be Charlies son that he knew nothing about.(hes slept with 1000+ women and no accidental pregnancies?) It could happen…

    Comment by Sophia – May 13, 2011 05:40 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Charlie was always the worst part of the show. As long as the supporting cast stays and writers, etc the show will still be funny. I think it will be a nice change.

    Comment by Melokesm – May 13, 2011 06:18 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I think that it’s a strategic move by Lorre et al because, if done well, it could refresh the show and take it in a new direction. I had liked the idea of Hugh Grant on the show as well.

    Comment by SAM – May 13, 2011 06:26 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • GREAT! I might watch this show.. Great Move

    Comment by HRU – May 13, 2011 07:56 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • They should of just canclled the show, i most likely will not watch it anymore.

    I watch Two and a half men every weekend when i go see my dad, i even watch the ones i’ve seen a dozen times and the repeats just because it makes me laugh beyond belife.

    But now, well it’s dead.

    Shame… wish Charlie Sheen would get his act together and come back.

    Comment by Rob – May 13, 2011 08:55 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I like charlie because he is a bad boy. Ashton is preppy. It doesn’t feel the same. But maybe I can overlook that lets see.

    Comment by ann – May 13, 2011 08:57 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • He should play Charlies long lost son

    Comment by stephanie – May 13, 2011 09:04 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I won’t be watching anymore.
    No Charlie , No show!
    They should had brought Charlie back or just cancel the show.

    Comment by Diana – May 13, 2011 09:06 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I totaly agree. I wish Charlie had come back, he was the show.

      Comment by shar – May 13, 2011 09:39 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I won’t be watching. I like Ashton Kutcher, but replace Charlie Sheen, Ha!! it will never happen. Just take the show off the air. No Charlie, no show.

    Comment by shar – May 13, 2011 09:37 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • YEAH! I like the show and everything, but I can´t stand Charlie Sheen
    With Ashton the show will be so much better, I love him, he’s so hot :D

    Comment by Frimi – May 13, 2011 09:40 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Funny thing is, I remember years ago when people screamed about Charlie Sheen replacing Michael J. Fox on Spin City! Surprise, the show went an extra two seasons with the new guy. You never know how these things play out. Give Kutcher a chance.

    Comment by RAGGEDT – May 13, 2011 09:43 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • When did people “scream” about Charlie replacing Michael J Fox? Everyone knew that Fox was leaving for health reasons and wanted the show to go on without him.

      Comment by Lois – May 13, 2011 10:04 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
      • Nobody screamed when Sheen replaced Fox. Michael J. Fox wanted the show to continue and suggested Charlie Sheen to replace him. They brought Sheen in when Fox was still on so they could have a smooth transition. Fox remained as a producer on the show.

        Comment by maggie – May 14, 2011 02:55 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Michael Ausiello, I wouldn’t brag about this. Ashton Kutcher is a horrible actor. Do you really want any credit for this when the show tanks with him as the lead?

    Comment by Lois – May 13, 2011 10:01 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I think Ashton is not a bad choice. I kind of figured the show was kapoot. And this is more interesting than kapoot. There are far worse shows on TV.

    Comment by allen – May 13, 2011 10:13 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • why would an A lister like kutcher who has been starring in movies want to do tv? that too 2.5 men. i guess its all about the money.

    Comment by timelord – May 13, 2011 10:23 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • Ashton’s not an A-lister. His movies all bomb.

      Comment by Rose – May 13, 2011 01:55 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Ashton sucks. Bad move CBS.

    Comment by cmj – May 13, 2011 10:42 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Bad idea! Ashton can’t act and the show is now doomed to certain failure! Good-bye Men!

    Comment by Kate – May 13, 2011 10:48 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • So…Ashton will be playing Jake’s younger brother…?

    Comment by Don – May 13, 2011 10:51 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • As a comedy artist Charlie Sheen is unmatched,I don’t think there is any other actor who can bring in so much humour into a sitcom like 2.5 Men, as Charlie has done for 8 years. Ashton is one awesome dude and he has a great knack for comedy, but these two actors are way different in their approaches towards comedy. While Charlie uses his gifted million dollar facial expressions, Ashton mainly entertains using his funny body languages and his stereotypical tone.

    I think the ninth season will be a hit, no matter what, merely coz of the hype already on. The way I see it, Chuck Lorre is definitely gonna kill ‘Charlie Harper’ and while Alan is hoping to inherit Charlie’s house and wealth, comes the illegitimate son of Charlie’s from an 80′s drunken night. He’ll live at the Malibu beach House ‘Charlie Style’ . If this is how Lorre plans it, there is immense scope for comedy.

    Comment by Harris – May 13, 2011 11:15 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Crazy internet people. :-D

    Comment by TV Gord – May 13, 2011 11:26 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I still think Hugh Grant would have been better.

    Comment by ann – May 13, 2011 11:30 AM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Well, guess it came down to a last-minute “who’s available and willing to work with Chuck Lorre”. The “creative differences” with Hugh Grant probably all revolved around Mr. Lorre. Still not sure if it would have worked with him, either (Brits on American TV don’t fare too well – look at Hugh Laurie and his impersonation of an American).

    Comment by Bob – May 13, 2011 12:03 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
    • I’ve looked at Hugh Laurie, and he’s brilliant as House.

      Comment by Rose – May 13, 2011 01:57 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I like Ashton. I never watched before, but may now.

    Comment by Pamela – May 13, 2011 12:34 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Charlie Vs Ashton hmm..

    Comment by jessie – May 13, 2011 12:35 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • It’s not really my cup of tea, so to speak, but I definitely think that the show has a better character with Ashton Kutcher as they did with Charlie Sheen, given his recent erratic behaviour. I think it will boost the show and draw even more viewers. I wish them all the best.

    Comment by Caro – May 13, 2011 12:56 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I have never watched the show, even though I love Jon Cryer, because Charlie Sheen has always given me the creeps. Big time. I liked Ashton Kutcher on “That 70s Show”, so maybe I’ll give it a chance now. I’m just soooooo glad they didn’t reward that egomaniac for his pathetic behavior.

    Comment by Lori – May 13, 2011 01:19 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • How will this effect characters like Rose & Evelyn?

    Comment by rod – May 13, 2011 02:11 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • I can’t imagine 2.5 men without Charlie Sheen! I like Kutcher as much as the next guy and I probably will check out the new episode(s)but Charlie (Harper) was the craziest and funniest character on the show next to Bertha. Alan is annoying as hell, Jake doesn’t really have much to do.
    We’ll see!

    Comment by O – May 13, 2011 02:32 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Ashton Kutcher… I actually plan on watching this show now. Ashton is actually funny, in a non train-wreck kind of way. I know that’ll be difficult for Sheen fans to grasp, laughing at the comedy in the show instead of the tragedy that is Charlie Sheen.

    Comment by Jacki – May 13, 2011 02:47 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • with out Charlie it wont be the same funny show,no on can replace him. i watch him every night ,but now i wont ,hang in there Charlie it was a good run ,they should have paid you was the only show worth watching on the whole flipping network

    Comment by wayne calhoun – May 13, 2011 04:16 PM PDT  Reply To This Post
  • Watching Ashton Kutcher fill the role of Charlie will be like watching soft porn. Seriously people, you’d rather have cute as apple pie, every mother loves him Ashton Kutcher over bad-ass Charlie?!!

    I’ll take bad ass Charlie!!

    Comment by Cheeky – May 13, 2011 04:21 PM PDT  Reply To This Post

Leave a Reply

Comments on are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't frakkin' curse, and be gone with your offers of discount leather goods. Talk smart about TV!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s